InBasket AI
Start pilot
Care domain

Behavioral Health

Counsellor talking with a patient in a calm consultation room
Representative illustration — not a real patient or clinical outcome.

Behavioral health brings screening, assessment, safety planning, and medication monitoring beside physical care.

Why it matters

In 2021 about 1 in 7 people worldwide — some 1.1 billion — lived with a mental disorder, anxiety and depression most common (WHO, 2025). Care barely reaches those who need it: in low-income countries fewer than 10% of people with psychosis receive care, compared with more than 50% in higher-income countries, and the global median mental-health workforce is just 13 per 100,000 people (WHO, 2025). The cost of neglect is enormous — depression and anxiety alone cost the global economy about $1 trillion a year — while mental-health spending ranges from up to $65 per person annually in high-income countries to $0.04 in low-income ones (WHO, 2025).

InBasket AI keeps mental and physical care on one continuous record so a small care team can work from a single, trustworthy source of truth — part of expanding access to care for the next billion people.

Designed with reference to recognized global, national, and clinical standards

This care area is designed with reference to a standards ecosystem, including global guidance, national protocols, specialty-society recommendations, interoperability standards, and programme reporting requirements where applicable:

  • PHQ-9 / GAD-7 validated instruments and WHO mhGAP screening tools
  • WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide (depression, self-harm/suicide, psychosis modules)
  • DSM-5-TR / ICD-11 diagnostic terminology where locally adopted
  • National mental-health, crisis escalation, safeguarding, and psychotropic medication-monitoring protocols
  • National Ministry of Health standard treatment guidelines, essential medicines lists, and local scope-of-practice rules for the implementation setting
  • HL7 FHIR, ICD-10, LOINC, SNOMED CT, and local terminology/coding standards where adopted

Standards sources

These sources substantiate the standards named above. Implementation-specific national protocols are selected from official national or regional authorities during deployment.

  1. World Health Organization guidelines and publications
  2. Official national Ministry of Health protocols for the implementation setting — Implementation-specific: selected from the official national or regional authority during deployment.
  3. WHO ICD classifications
  4. APA DSM
  5. HL7 FHIR
  6. LOINC
  7. SNOMED CT

Evidence sources

See it in your setting.

Start a guided pilot conversation — we’ll map the care setting, deployment model, and first workflows together.

Start a pilot conversation