InBasket AI
Programme workflow

Family Planning Programme

Family planning connects method counselling and eligibility screening to maternal and primary care.

Why it matters

Each year in the low- and middle-income countries of Africa, 29 million unintended pregnancies occur — 43% of all pregnancies — and 181,000 women die from pregnancy, abortion, or childbirth-related causes (Guttmacher, 2024). The unmet need is large: about 32 million women in these countries have an unmet demand for modern contraception (Guttmacher, 2024). Investing closes the gap and saves money and lives — every additional $1 spent on contraceptive services in these countries saves $2.49 in maternal, newborn, and abortion care, and meeting all sexual and reproductive health needs would cut maternal deaths by 67% (Guttmacher, 2024).

InBasket AI keeps family-planning and maternal care on one continuous record so a small care team can work from a single, trustworthy source of truth — part of expanding access to care for the next billion people.

Designed with reference to recognized global, national, and clinical standards

This care area is designed with reference to a standards ecosystem, including global guidance, national protocols, specialty-society recommendations, interoperability standards, and programme reporting requirements where applicable:

  • WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC) and Selected Practice Recommendations for contraceptive use
  • CDC U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria / Selected Practice Recommendations where locally applicable
  • FIGO and national postpartum-family-planning implementation guidance where adopted
  • National reproductive-health commodity, counselling, consent, and reporting requirements
  • National Ministry of Health standard treatment guidelines, essential medicines lists, and local scope-of-practice rules for the implementation setting
  • HL7 FHIR, ICD-10, LOINC, SNOMED CT, and local terminology/coding standards where adopted
  • National programme registers, surveillance definitions, DHIS2 or equivalent reporting requirements, and donor-reporting mappings where adopted

Standards sources

These sources substantiate the standards named above. Implementation-specific national protocols are selected from official national or regional authorities during deployment.

  1. World Health Organization guidelines and publications
  2. CDC clinical guidance
  3. CDC ACIP vaccine recommendations
  4. Official national Ministry of Health protocols for the implementation settingImplementation-specific: selected from the official national or regional authority during deployment.
  5. FIGO guidance and publications
  6. HL7 FHIR
  7. WHO ICD classifications
  8. LOINC
  9. SNOMED CT
  10. National programme registers, DHIS2 or equivalent reporting requirementsImplementation-specific programme registers and reporting rules are configured from official national systems where adopted.

Evidence sources

See it in your setting.

Start a guided pilot conversation — we’ll map the care setting, deployment model, and first workflows together.

Start a pilot conversation